Smarter Cambridge Transport

Causeway to an isolated new community

As sanctioned by the Local Plan, planning permission has been granted for 430 new homes on land north and south of Worts’ Causeway. If you’re not familiar with that road, it’s a narrow country lane, running from south of the Addenbrooke’s roundabout over the Gog Magog Hills.

As new edge-of-city developments, their success depends heavily on residents having easy access to the rest of the city. By ‘success’, I mean enabling all residents to lead sustainable, healthy and socially integrated lives. So, what are the targets set for sustainable travel? A reduction in the proportion of residents’ trips made by car from around 35% to 30%. Yes, a whopping five percentage point reduction. Faced with climate and public health crises, the poverty of ambition is deeply concerning.

But even that target will be challenging. As Camcycle and many local Queen Edith’s residents endeavoured to point out to our planners, the walking and cycling routes are far from ideal. All cars, cycles and pedestrians from the northern development will be funnelled down to Worts’ Causeway. The pavement there on the north side will be extended and widened east of Field Way, with cycling permitted.

If you live towards the northern edge of the development, your route to Queen Edith Community Primary School will be 2km. Faced with how long the trip will take on foot, and having to share the narrow cut-through to Almoners’ Avenue with people cycling, how many residents will instead choose to drive to visit local shops or their GP, or to take their children to school?

The developer could purchase a property on the open market to create a cut-through to Almoners’ Avenue or Beaumont Road, reducing the walking distance by up to 1km and bypassing narrow cut-throughs. The transport officer asked for a planning condition “to determine that all reasonable efforts have been made by the applicant” to do this. The planning officer demurred, defending the developer rather than the welfare of future residents.

It’s not over yet: the developer still has to seek consent for detailed plans. Those had better include a second pedestrian/cycle access point.

This article was first published in the Cambridge Independent on 10 February 2021.

Edward Leigh

Edward Leigh is the leader of Smarter Cambridge Transport, chair and independent co-opted member of the Cambridgeshire Police and Crime Panel, chair of the South Petersfield Residents Association, business owner, consultant, and occasional blogger about making the world and Cambridge a better place to live.

1 comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • The gap between the existing houses on the east side of Beaumont Road opposite Netherhall wWay where the school used to have a pavilion could give access to the school playing field, with a path along the eastern boundaries of existing houses to the north east corner of the currently permitted Netherhall Farm development – as the present field behind No 47 will be developed almost certainly in the future now the idea of Green Belt around here is a dead duck in the Planners eyes.
    A cheap option?
    But existing residents might not like it.