Mill Road in Cambridge will be closed from 1st July to 25th August 2019 to allow Network Rail to rebuild the bridge over the railway.
Effective lobbying by local councillors and residents has ensured there will be a temporary pedestrian bridge open during most of the works. There will also be shuttle buses running from either side of the bridge, on the west to Drummer St, on the east to Sainsbury’s at Coldham’s Lane. (I argue these should in fact run further, on the west side to Cambridge station via Tenison Road, and on the east to Addenbrooke’s.)
Notably, there have been no street protests or threats of judicial review over how socially unjust the closure is, or how it will damage local businesses. That’s because it’s temporary, seemingly inevitable, and (whisper it) quite popular.
As a society we accept that ‘rat running’ is bad and removing through traffic from residential areas is good. But we take the opposite view when the road in question has shops or is an ‘arterial’ route.
Plenty of research studies have shown that people who walk or cycle to a street spend more than those who drive there. And Mill Road isn’t really an arterial route: it only runs out as far as the outer ‘ring’ road. Would the impact of its closure be acceptable long-term? Let’s see: unlike mathematical models, real-life experiments give you real answers. Cameras have been set up to monitor changes in vehicle, cycle and pedestrian traffic on Mill Road and diversionary routes.
We know we must make radical changes to the way we travel around. We’re naturally resistant to change that might cause us inconvenience or disadvantage relative to now or, perhaps more affectingly, relative to other people. It’s difficult to imagine, yet alone predict reliably, how other people will change their behaviour, and how that in turn will affect us.
So, let’s learn from Mill Road closure, and use it as a template for running experimental closures elsewhere in the city. In the words of the King, “A little less conversation, a little more action please.”
This article was first published in the Cambridge Independent on 15 May 2019.